On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 11:23, Jacob Kroon <jacob.kr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I vote for removing the check altogether. > > As I understand it, the check was added in order to prevent > hard-to-interpret error messages when network failed. I can live with that.
I think the check should remain, and example.com has served well for some time now (since 2016 in 423a2645377bff2cd7292e1dc9796eeb3595e937). We moved to example.com to speed up the check: the old tests were for two yoctoproject.org URLs and it downloads the entire page, so that took time. If we can get a minimal page added to yoctoproject.org that doesn't involve hitting WordPress, then we can own the URL and have fast responses. Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#161644): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/161644 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89066994/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-