On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 11:23, Jacob Kroon <jacob.kr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I vote for removing the check altogether.
>
> As I understand it, the check was added in order to prevent
> hard-to-interpret error messages when network failed. I can live with that.

I think the check should remain, and example.com has served well for
some time now (since 2016 in
423a2645377bff2cd7292e1dc9796eeb3595e937).

We moved to example.com to speed up the check: the old tests were for
two yoctoproject.org URLs and it downloads the entire page, so that
took time.

If we can get a minimal page added to yoctoproject.org that doesn't
involve hitting WordPress, then we can own the URL and have fast
responses.

Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#161644): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/161644
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89066994/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to