On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:31 AM Ross Burton <r...@burtonini.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 15:52, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > -PACKAGECONFIG[opengl] = > > "-DSDL_OPENGL=ON,-DSDL_OPENGL=OFF,virtual/libgl" > > +PACKAGECONFIG[opengl] = "-DSDL_OPENGL=ON,-DSDL_OPENGL=OFF,virtual/egl" > > What does libSDL2 look for, then? Is it EGL explicitly? Or GLX? Or > something else.
it looks for egl implementation provider which in X case is same as virtual/libgl provider ( mesa ) in next release I think we should make clear difference between openGL implementations instead of specifying pins on libraries > > I agree that the virtual/libgl thing is a mess, but if we're clearing > it up we need to clear about what is changing. > > Ross
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#163419): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/163419 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89640092/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
