On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 07:19:09PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:07:14AM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:51 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > > <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: > > > I'm saying leave it there even if its not maintained. I can still go > > > search > > > for patches sent by me or other specific people. > > > > thats what mailing list archives are for. > > is there something like > oe/contrib/patchwork/pw-am.sh > for some mailing list archive? > > When I see some interesting patch in ML, easiest way for me to get it to > development branch is to open patchwork web (from any computer) and then > call pw-am.sh NUMBER in screen session on my development workstation. > > Even when reading mail in mutt on the same machine it's easier for me to > use pw-am.sh to get that patch to my chroot for OE builds. > > And that git hook marking them as applied works very well.. so usually I > just have to mark cover letters as applied.
I'd vote for keeping patchworks as well - there are rare patches submitted to oe-core w/o corresponding pull requests... -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core