On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 10:43 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 19:01 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 18:57, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 20:27 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > pkg_postinst_dhcp-server() { > > > + install -d $D/${localstatedir}/lib/dhcp > > > > > > Is "install" guaranteed to be available on the target? I > > would have > > thought "mkdir -p" would be better. > > > > > > It worked on all images I tested. I have no strong opinions about it. > > I just checked a rootfs that I happened to have lying around and there > was indeed no "install" binary in there. Admittedly I always build with > O_P_M=none so it isn't going to cause me any real problem, but > presumably there might be other folks who have O_P_M on and still lack > "install". So I think it would be best to change this.
Agreed, mkdir is much more likely to be available than install on most target machines. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core