On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 10:43 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 19:01 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 18:57, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 20:27 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > pkg_postinst_dhcp-server() {
> > > + install -d $D/${localstatedir}/lib/dhcp
> >
> >
> > Is "install" guaranteed to be available on the target? I
> > would have
> > thought "mkdir -p" would be better.
> >
> >
> > It worked on all images I tested. I have no strong opinions about it.
>
> I just checked a rootfs that I happened to have lying around and there
> was indeed no "install" binary in there. Admittedly I always build with
> O_P_M=none so it isn't going to cause me any real problem, but
> presumably there might be other folks who have O_P_M on and still lack
> "install". So I think it would be best to change this.
Agreed, mkdir is much more likely to be available than install on most
target machines.
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
