Hello,
On 13/07/2022 10:28:03+0200, Luis Enriquez wrote:
> This allows choosing padding algorithm when building fitImage. It may be
> pkcs-1.5 or pss.
>
> Signed-off-by: LUIS ENRIQUEZ <luis.enriq...@se.com>
> From: LUIS ENRIQUEZ <lenriquez...@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> index 5f5e9dd444..7c0d93625b 100644
> --- a/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes/kernel-fitimage.bbclass
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ FIT_HASH_ALG ?= "sha256"
> # fitImage Signature Algo
> FIT_SIGN_ALG ?= "rsa2048"
>
> +# fitImage Padding Algo
> +FIT_PAD_ALG ?= "pkcs-1.5"
> +
> #
> # Emit the fitImage ITS header
> #
> @@ -250,6 +253,7 @@ fitimage_emit_section_config() {
>
> conf_csum="${FIT_HASH_ALG}"
> conf_sign_algo="${FIT_SIGN_ALG}"
> + conf_padding_algo="${FIT_PAD_ALG}"
> if [ "${UBOOT_SIGN_ENABLE}" = "1" ] ; then
> conf_sign_keyname="${UBOOT_SIGN_KEYNAME}"
> fi
> @@ -333,6 +337,7 @@ EOF
> signature-1 {
> algo = "${conf_csum},${conf_sign_algo}";
> key-name-hint = "${conf_sign_keyname}";
> + padding = "${conf_padding_algo}";
This doesn't apply on master, because of 2b5f5e295e9a ("featimage:
refactor style"). Can you rebase? Also, did you make sure you pass the
oe-selftest?
> ${sign_line}
> };
> EOF
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#168054):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/168054
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/92328664/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
