On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 16:03 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 13:29, Richard Purdie > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > I understand why you want to do that but this will totally break the > > nfs export support, I could see at least one issue having looked at the > > first few patches this was dropping. > > I can go over every spot in poky/ where unfs is mentioned and verify > that it works correctly there, would that be ok?
It would help, yes. If you do that it could be good to understand and document which areas we do/don't have test coverage of some kind for as we could then look at either adding it or dropping that support if it isn't used. > > There was one failure in a-full with glibc tests, and that's fixed, > but I can see there are more spots revealed by grep, e.g. runqemu and > sdk_ext. They just aren't automatically tested. A change that worried me a lot was the removal of the custom ports as it means only one client can run on a given system. I think that could mean that we'd potentially hit issues if two tests ran on the same build server. That is relatively unlikely but it is the kind of race we've spent a lot of time removing on the autobuilder to avoid rare failures. I didn't look further at the other patches being removed, that one worried me alone. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#173683): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/173683 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/95151297/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
