Please submit the patch upstream first. Alex
On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 00:18, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > --- > ...sing-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch | 52 +++++++++++++++++++ > meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb | 1 + > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/0001-Define-alignof-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch > > diff --git > a/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/0001-Define-alignof-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch > > b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/0001-Define-alignof-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000..1c472886b3 > --- /dev/null > +++ > b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/0001-Define-alignof-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ > +From 82c893bb9e01f914a6bdef1bef943af746cfc3e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > +Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:42:18 -0800 > +Subject: [PATCH] Define alignof using _Alignof when using C11 or newer > + > +WG14 N2350 made very clear that it is an UB having type definitions > +within "offsetof" [1]. This patch enhances the implementation of macro > +alignof_slot to use builtin "_Alignof" to avoid undefined behavior on > +when using std=c11 or newer > + > +clang 16+ has started to flag this [2] > + > +Fixes build when using -std >= gnu11 and using clang16+ > + > +Older compilers gcc < 4.9 or clang < 8 has buggy _Alignof even though it > +may support C11, exclude those compilers too > + > +[1] https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2350.htm > +[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D133574 > + > +Upstream-Status: Pending > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> > +--- > + sha1.c | 12 +++++++++++- > + 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > + > +diff --git a/sha1.c b/sha1.c > +index 89b32f4..1e4ad5d 100644 > +--- a/sha1.c > ++++ b/sha1.c > +@@ -229,7 +229,17 @@ sha1_process_bytes (const void *buffer, size_t len, > struct sha1_ctx *ctx) > + if (len >= 64) > + { > + #if !_STRING_ARCH_unaligned > +-# define alignof(type) offsetof (struct { char c; type x; }, x) > ++/* GCC releases before GCC 4.9 had a bug in _Alignof. See GCC bug 52023 > ++ <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52023>. > ++ clang versions < 8.0.0 have the same bug. */ > ++# if (!defined __STDC_VERSION__ || __STDC_VERSION__ < 201112 \ > ++ || (defined __GNUC__ && __GNUC__ < 4 + (__GNUC_MINOR__ < 9) \ > ++ && !defined __clang__) \ > ++ || (defined __clang__ && __clang_major__ < 8)) > ++# define alignof(type) offsetof (struct { char c; type x; }, x) > ++# else > ++# define alignof(type) _Alignof(type) > ++# endif > + # define UNALIGNED_P(p) (((size_t) p) % alignof (sha1_uint32) != 0) > + if (UNALIGNED_P (buffer)) > + while (len > 64) > +-- > +2.39.0 > + > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb > b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb > index 7298860241..1c4397509b 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ SRC_URI = > "${KERNELORG_MIRROR}/linux/utils/raid/mdadm/${BPN}-${PV}.tar.xz \ > file://0001-Fix-parsing-of-r-in-monitor-manager-mode.patch \ > file://0001-Makefile-install-mdcheck.patch \ > > file://0001-restripe.c-Use-_FILE_OFFSET_BITS-to-enable-largefile.patch \ > + > file://0001-Define-alignof-using-_Alignof-when-using-C11-or-newe.patch \ > " > > SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > "461c215670864bb74a4d1a3620684aa2b2f8296dffa06743f26dda5557acf01d" > -- > 2.39.0 > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#176074): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/176074 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96343396/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-