On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 11:08 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>
> This should have been caught by meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py
> - why wasn't it? Does the test need to be fixed?
The simple test case doesn't have the problematic syntax. Should I add this to
the patch?
diff --git a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py
b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py
index ee515be188..147ee3e0ee 100644
--- a/meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py
+++ b/meta/lib/oeqa/sdk/cases/buildepoxy.py
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ class EpoxyTest(OESDKTestCase):
self.assertTrue(os.path.isdir(dirs["source"]))
os.makedirs(dirs["build"])
- log = self._run("meson -Degl=no -Dglx=no -Dx11=false {build}
{source}".format(**dirs))
+ log = self._run("meson --warnlevel 1 -Degl=no -Dglx=no -Dx11=false
{build} {source}".format(**dirs))
# Check that Meson thinks we're doing a cross build and not a native
self.assertIn("Build type: cross build", log)
self._run("ninja -C {build} -v".format(**dirs))
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#178023):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/178023
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/97369067/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
