Op 2 mrt. 2012, om 14:26 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 18:34 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
>> The libpam's has an error when generating the rootfs:
>>
>> chmod: cannot access `/usr/sbin/unix_chkpwd': No such file or directory
>>
>> This is because the following code in libpam_1.1.5.bb:
>>
>> pkg_postinst_pam-plugin-unix () {
>> # below is necessary to allow unix_chkpwd get user info from shadow file
>> # on lsb images
>> chmod 4755 ${sbindir}/unix_chkpwd
>> }
>>
>> This is to set the setuid permission for unix_chkpwd (the lsb test
>> requires this), but it lacks a "${D}", and we can do this in the install
>> stage.
>>
>> [YOCTO #2049]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <[email protected]>
>
> Robert, in future patches could you use a subject line like:
>
> [PATCH 1/1 v2] Fix libpam's chmod
>
> instead of:
>
> [PATCH 1/1] V2 Fix libpam's chmod
>
> so that when the patches get applied, the V2 is stripped off?
>
> The reason is that the value isn't particularly within the repository
> once merged and doesn't look good when looking through commit history.
Actually both versions above are wrong, the right version would be similar to:
libpam 1.1.5: fix chmod in postinst
We can debate the usefulness of the version specifier, but we do need to follow
the commit guide for the rest.
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
