Hi,

it looks like this change is causing mkfs.ext4 to segfault on some builders.

I'm seeing it on ubuntu-18.04 (I know it's unsupported now). It might be
related to older docker or libseccomp2 there, because there is similar
issue with gdk-pixbuf-native which fails when buildtools-extended is used
together with this and might be related to
https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/43595 because when I try very similar
18.04 ubuntu image on my gentoo host I cannot reproduce neither the
gdk-pixbuf-native failure nor the mkfs.ext4 segfaults.

I'm trying to get access to some of the affected boxes to find out which
version docker/libseccomp2 is used there and to double check that this is
root cause for these failures (now I can only confirm that it started in
Nanbield when this uninative upgrade was merged and now I've reproduced the
same with kirkstone-nut with the same uninative upgrade.

It might be useful to delay backporting this for a bit longer (and I'll
soon confirm if 3.10 was already affected or not).

Regards,

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:22 AM Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com> wrote:

> From: Michael Halstead <mhalst...@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Halstead <mhalst...@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org>
> (cherry picked from commit f87becb69e02bdf055dffb633ed4f6d36b36f7a7)
> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com>
> ---
>  meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> b/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> index f3c05b7e20..ad4816a1f3 100644
> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/yocto-uninative.inc
> @@ -7,9 +7,9 @@
>  #
>
>  UNINATIVE_MAXGLIBCVERSION = "2.37"
> -UNINATIVE_VERSION = "3.10"
> +UNINATIVE_VERSION = "4.0"
>
>  UNINATIVE_URL ?= "
> http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/uninative/${UNINATIVE_VERSION}/
> "
> -UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[aarch64] ?=
> "b11f7dff0ff5e3c971f22e89a105efb0f8d2006fd71d1ea3e5da771e416b0e01"
> -UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[i686] ?=
> "ad7daa7fca7693ca07eea5279f830333530171d357759b380954a25254edd8dd"
> -UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[x86_64] ?=
> "ce8ff7e3247da312fbf84008f415bc1b4d113ac9fe4ec91581e4a20cd8b475d3"
> +UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[aarch64] ?=
> "7baa8418a302df52e00916193b0a04f318356d9d2670c9a2bce3e966efefd738"
> +UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[i686] ?=
> "83114d36883d43a521e280742b9849bf85d039b2f83d8e21d480659babe75ee8"
> +UNINATIVE_CHECKSUM[x86_64] ?=
> "fd75b2a1a67a10f6b7d65afb7d0f3e71a63b0038e428f34dfe420bb37716558a"
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> 
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#182365): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/182365
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99279066/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to