On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:36:28AM +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 10:25, Julien Stephan <jstep...@baylibre.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for working on this. Should we think about how this could be > > > tested? > > Do you mean we should consider addind self test for bblock? or you want > > to discuss about acceptance criteria for bblock? > > Hello, > I mean mostly about what should be tested. How can we verify that the > script does what it's supposed to, in an automated way, so it won't > silently break as new changes to bitbake/oe-core are added? What > should such a test contain? > The specific form of tests (whether it's selftest, or maybe a part of > SDK testing, or something else) is secondary. > > Alex
Hi Alex, I just send the v3 with a lot of improvements! Here is what I do during my dev: - lock a recipe's task for a given arch (qemux86-64 vs qemuarm) - modify the given task - check that for the selected arch, task is locked (but not for other arch) Maybe we need to be more formal with that? I would be happy to provide a test script if needed. Cheers Julien
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#184937): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/184937 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100277504/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
