Older glibc on host might be missing __glibc_has_attribute added in glibc-2.34 
with:

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blobdiff;f=misc/sys/cdefs.h;h=8e244a77cf6271f09cbd26d18b1e07b1d1641404;hp=57ca262bdfb642bf4a945645532f2319ec1ff437;hb=c8ba52ab3350c334d6e34b1439a4c0c1431351f3;hpb=7dd416491e080456fc7742d884c520526509413e

Fixes:
In file included from ../git/localedef/include/programs/xmalloc.h:21,
                 from glibc/locale/programs/localedef.h:124,
                 from glibc/locale/programs/localedef.c:36:
../git/localedef/include/sys/cdefs.h:85:51: error: missing binary operator 
before token "("
   85 | #if __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 3) || __glibc_has_attribute (__cold__)
      |                                                   ^

Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
---
 .../glibc/cross-localedef-native_2.38.bb      |  1 +
 ...cdefs.h-define-__glibc_has_attribute.patch | 51 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 
meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0003-localedef-cdefs.h-define-__glibc_has_attribute.patch

diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/cross-localedef-native_2.38.bb 
b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/cross-localedef-native_2.38.bb
index e7261a644b..673008c57a 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/cross-localedef-native_2.38.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/cross-localedef-native_2.38.bb
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ SRC_URI = "${GLIBC_GIT_URI};branch=${SRCBRANCH};name=glibc \
            \
            file://0001-localedef-Add-hardlink-resolver-from-util-linux.patch \
            file://0002-localedef-fix-ups-hardlink-to-make-it-compile.patch \
+           
file://0003-localedef-cdefs.h-define-__glibc_has_attribute.patch;patchdir=localedef
 \
            \
            file://0010-eglibc-Cross-building-and-testing-instructions.patch \
            file://0011-eglibc-Help-bootstrap-cross-toolchain.patch \
diff --git 
a/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0003-localedef-cdefs.h-define-__glibc_has_attribute.patch
 
b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0003-localedef-cdefs.h-define-__glibc_has_attribute.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d34651e275
--- /dev/null
+++ 
b/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc/0003-localedef-cdefs.h-define-__glibc_has_attribute.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+From a90ba625410f8b49205adbe03652bc2fd0c35cec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
+Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 01:23:59 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] cdefs.h: define __glibc_has_attribute
+
+Older glibc on host might be missing __glibc_has_attribute added in glibc-2.34 
with:
+
+https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blobdiff;f=misc/sys/cdefs.h;h=8e244a77cf6271f09cbd26d18b1e07b1d1641404;hp=57ca262bdfb642bf4a945645532f2319ec1ff437;hb=c8ba52ab3350c334d6e34b1439a4c0c1431351f3;hpb=7dd416491e080456fc7742d884c520526509413e
+
+Fixes:
+In file included from ../git/localedef/include/programs/xmalloc.h:21,
+                 from glibc/locale/programs/localedef.h:124,
+                 from glibc/locale/programs/localedef.c:36:
+../git/localedef/include/sys/cdefs.h:85:51: error: missing binary operator 
before token "("
+   85 | #if __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 3) || __glibc_has_attribute (__cold__)
+      |                                                   ^
+
+Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com>
+Upstream-Status: Submitted [https://github.com/kraj/localedef/pull/4]
+---
+ include/sys/cdefs.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
+
+diff --git a/include/sys/cdefs.h b/include/sys/cdefs.h
+index 0f32fdb..8530054 100644
+--- a/include/sys/cdefs.h
++++ b/include/sys/cdefs.h
+@@ -37,6 +37,23 @@
+ #endif
+ #endif
+ 
++#if !defined __glibc_has_attribute
++/* Older glibc on host might be missing __glibc_has_attribute added in 
glibc-2.34 with:
++   
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=blobdiff;f=misc/sys/cdefs.h;h=8e244a77cf6271f09cbd26d18b1e07b1d1641404;hp=57ca262bdfb642bf4a945645532f2319ec1ff437;hb=c8ba52ab3350c334d6e34b1439a4c0c1431351f3;hpb=7dd416491e080456fc7742d884c520526509413e
++*/
++/* Compilers that lack __has_attribute may object to
++       #if defined __has_attribute && __has_attribute (...)
++   even though they do not need to evaluate the right-hand side of the &&.
++   Similarly for __has_builtin, etc.  */
++#if (defined __has_attribute \
++     && (!defined __clang_minor__ \
++         || 3 < __clang_major__ + (5 <= __clang_minor__)))
++# define __glibc_has_attribute(attr) __has_attribute (attr)
++#else
++# define __glibc_has_attribute(attr) 0
++#endif
++#endif
++
+ #if !defined(__REDIRECT_NTH) && defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ >= 2
+ # ifdef __cplusplus
+ #  define __REDIRECT_NTH(name, proto, alias) \
-- 
2.41.0

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#186299): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/186299
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100796990/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to