On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 14:00, Alexander Kanavin <alex.kana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Upstream however should be made aware of the issue, so there should be
> either a link to the patch submission, or a link to an upstream ticket
> as well.
There is no issue tracker for mdadm. And granted all test.broken files
in OE's patchset I doubt that mdadm / linux-raid people are really
interested in these reports.
>
> Alex
>
> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 12:56, Richard Purdie
> <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2023-08-18 at 13:50 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > strace program is not yet ported to RiscV 32 arch. Disable corresponding
> > > dependency and test to remove dependency on the non-existing package,
> > > which otherwise breaks building of core images:
> > >
> > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'strace' (but
> > > /oe/poky/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb RDEPENDS on or
> > > otherwise requires it)
> > > strace was skipped: incompatible with host riscv32-poky-linux (not in
> > > COMPATIBLE_HOST)
> > > NOTE: Runtime target 'strace' is unbuildable, removing...
> > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['strace']
> > > NOTE: Runtime target 'mdadm' is unbuildable, removing...
> > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['mdadm', 'strace']
> > > NOTE: Runtime target 'matchbox-terminal' is unbuildable, removing...
> > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['matchbox-terminal',
> > > 'gtk+3', 'glib-2.0', 'util-linux', 'mdadm', 'strace']
> > > ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-weston' has no buildable
> > > providers.
> > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-weston',
> > > 'matchbox-terminal', 'gtk+3', 'glib-2.0', 'util-linux', 'mdadm', 'strace']
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.barysh...@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > .../mdadm/files/broken-strace-rv32.patch | 10 ++++++++++
> > > meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb | 4 ++++
> > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644
> > > meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/broken-strace-rv32.patch
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/broken-strace-rv32.patch
> > > b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/broken-strace-rv32.patch
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..a58495008605
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/files/broken-strace-rv32.patch
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > +Index: mdadm-4.2/tests/07revert-inplace.broken
> > > +===================================================================
> > > +--- /dev/null
> > > ++++ mdadm-4.2/tests/07revert-inplace.broken
> > > +@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > > ++fails on RiscV32
> > > ++
> > > ++Fails with the following message:
> > > ++ strace -o /tmp/str ./mdadm -A /dev/md0 --update=revert-reshape
> > > /dev/<...>
> > > ++ tests/07revert-inplace: line 40: strace: command not found
> > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb
> > > b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb
> > > index fa50325f1f71..3085222061f0 100644
> > > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb
> > > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/mdadm/mdadm_4.2.bb
> > > @@ -126,3 +126,7 @@ RRECOMMENDS:${PN}-ptest += " \
> > > "
> > >
> > > FILES:${PN} += "${systemd_unitdir}/*"
> > > +
> > > +# strace is not yet ported to rv32
> > > +SRC_URI:riscv32 += "broken-strace-rv32.patch"
> > > +RDEPENDS:${PN}-ptest:remove:riscv32 = "strace"
> >
> > The patch has no Upstream-Status: entry which makes me wonder how it
> > was tested as this should have given warnings.
> >
> > I also suspect it may be easier to just write a
> > do_install:append:riscv32 that creates the file instead of a patch?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#186375):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/186375
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100817941/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
