Hi Ross,
I'm currently writing the doc patch for LICENSE_FLAGS_DETAILS.
However, I don't find the current behavior optimal...
On 21.06.23 at 16:22, ross.bur...@arm.com wrote:
From: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com>
Don't prefix the output of LICENSE_FLAGS_DETAILS with "For further
details, see" so that recipes can put arbitrary text in their license
details instead of being limited to a specific sentence structure.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@arm.com>
---
meta/classes-global/base.bbclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/classes-global/base.bbclass b/meta/classes-global/base.bbclass
index 976a2ddee4b..cbda8d12f09 100644
--- a/meta/classes-global/base.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes-global/base.bbclass
@@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ python () {
message = "Has a restricted license '%s' which is not listed in
your LICENSE_FLAGS_ACCEPTED." % unmatched
details = d.getVarFlag("LICENSE_FLAGS_DETAILS", unmatched)
if details:
- message += " For further details, see %s." % details
+ message += details
What about
message += ' ' + details
instead?
Otherwise, you have to add a leading space to LICENSE_FLAGS_DETAILS.
What do you think?
Happy to send a patch if that helps...
Cheers
Michael.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#187411):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/187411
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/99677069/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
