Op 19 mrt. 2012, om 14:49 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:

> I'm faced with a bit of a dilemma with the number of queued changes. I'm
> not very happy with as many updates right on the release freeze deadline
> and I know this is causing problems for downstream trees like meta-oe
> too.

Patches to fix bbappend related breakage have been submitted for review:

http://patches.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=match

> I believe the testing done has found the problematic changes in the
> branch (alsa-utils, xserver-xorg and automake for example) and that
> we're in a reasonable state to merge these and I appreciate the work
> Saul and others have done in stabilising and testing the changes. I
> appreciate meta-oe needs more time to test and integrate these though.

Thanks!

> 
> One idea would be to feed these in though smaller sets of updates but
> since they've been tested as a unit, I don't really want to do this
> since I don't have a good feel for any interdependencies.


I'd advice people to stop sending huge patchset and break them up into 
manageable pullrequests and leave the combining to Sau!. Another option is to 
plainly refuse to even consider such huge patchsets so close to the freeze date.

Speaking of freeze dates, when is the schedule for oe-core going to be 
announced? I know there's some poky/yocto schedule somewhere, but I'm not into 
that, I just use oe-core.

regards,

Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to