On Fri, 2023-11-10 at 07:41 +0100, Vyacheslav Yurkov wrote:
> Some build systems (like cmake) check whether target binaries are
> present even if they are not used during compilation. Excluded ${bindir}
> causes such recipes to fail to build nativesdk variant. The good
> example of that is protobuf/grpc nativesdk build from meta-oe layer.
>
> For more details refer this long discussion:
> https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/topic/101679410#105284
>
> Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Yurkov <uvv.m...@gmail.com>
> ---
> meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass
> b/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass
> index d229f40107..72c811d609 100644
> --- a/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass
> +++ b/meta/classes-global/staging.bbclass
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE = " \
> ${localstatedir} \
> "
> SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-native = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
> +SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-nativesdk = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
> SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-cross = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
> SYSROOT_DIRS:append:class-crosssdk = " ${SYSROOT_DIRS_NATIVE}"
>
This has disk space performance implications. We don't want to to this
just because there is one "bad" recipe out there. I think we should be
working around the issue in that recipe, or changing cmake not to have
the issue. Adding a load of pointless binaries to the sysroot for all
recipes is not a good solution for us.
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#190401):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/190401
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102502647/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
