On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 00:50 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:11:16PM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 22:36 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > meta/recipes-gnome/gtk+/gtk+.inc | 4 ++++ > > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > I really don't like the message having a gtk+-native around sends out. > > Why do we need this? > > See cover letter if you haven't already.
Sorry, I'd looked at it but I'd missed the key bit. I think I thought the URL was a pull URL and my eyes skimmed it. To be honest I don't think the update-icon-cache is good enough reason to build a full gtk+-native. If we let these pieces in the dependencies have a tendency to grow and people have no incentive to try and fix these issues. I'd like to better understand why there is no other way to avoid this. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
