Initial patch is for the same. However got a feedback to use a separate
recipe as extending systemd-boot recipe made is messy with a bunch of
overrides for almost all tasks.
check: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/191307
//Viswanath
On 12/16/2023 5:04 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
Can we rather fold it into systemd-boot with bbassextend?
Alex
On Sat 16. Dec 2023 at 1.26, Viswanath Kraleti
<quic_vkral...@quicinc.com <mailto:quic_vkral...@quicinc.com>> wrote:
systemd-boot native recipe provides ukify tool to build
UKI images for systemd-boot
Signed-off-by: Viswanath Kraleti <quic_vkral...@quicinc.com
<mailto:quic_vkral...@quicinc.com>>
---
.../systemd/systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb
<http://systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb> | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb
<http://systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb>
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb
<http://systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb>
b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb
<http://systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb>
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..73db59b14e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb
<http://systemd-boot-native_254.4.bb>
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+require systemd.inc
+
+inherit native
+
+deltask do_configure
+deltask do_compile
+
+do_install () {
+ install -Dm 0755 ${S}/src/ukify/ukify.py ${D}${bindir}/ukify
+}
+addtask install after do_unpack
+
+PACKAGES = "${PN}"
+
+FILES:${PN} = "${bindir}/ukify"
--
2.25.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#192557):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/192557
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/103202155/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
