Hi, On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Mikko Rapeli via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > FWIW, we have been using upstream kernel.org aarch64 defconfig plus > few board specific fragments and few extra features for our testing needs. > I have been very happy that several major kernel version updates have already > been done this way and zero adaptations needed on our side for the > ARM SystemReady boards and firmware which we support. A simple CI run to show > passing test results was sufficient for a poky update with new kernel > major version. > > The implementation here looks pretty much like ours. Looks good, thanks Ross! > > More details of our setup: > > https://gitlab.com/Linaro/trustedsubstrate/meta-ledge-secure/-/blob/main/meta-ledge-secure/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ledge-common.inc?ref_type=heads > https://gitlab.com/Linaro/trustedsubstrate/meta-ledge-secure/-/tree/main/meta-ledge-secure/recipes-kernel/linux/ledgearm64-kmeta?ref_type=heads > https://trs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Our machine is based on poky qemuarm64 machine and thus uses KBRANCH:qemuarm64 so I don't see a need for new branch from linux-yocto recipe maintainer. https://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto/log/?h=v6.5/standard/qemuarm64 But maybe I don't see the full picture. Cheers, -Mikko
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#195974): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/195974 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/104486073/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
