On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 7:06 PM Li Wang via lists.openembedded.org <li.wang= windriver....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote:
> > On 7/30/2024 02:50, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 16:48, Li Wang via lists.openembedded.org > > <li.wang=windriver....@lists.openembedded.org> wrote: > >> when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back, > >> the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets deactivated, > >> if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated. > >> > >> date -s "xxx" > >> xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming > connections. Restarting in 10 seconds. > >> > >> the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected by > system time. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Li Wang <li.w...@windriver.com> > >> --- > >> .../xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch | 246 ++++++++++++++++++ > >> .../xinetd/xinetd_2.3.15.4.bb | 1 + > >> 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 > meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch > >> > >> diff --git > a/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch > b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000000..2144c3cba2 > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/xinetd/xinetd/use-monotonic-time.patch > >> @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ > >> +use monotonic time > >> + > >> +when using xinet.d to limit rsync connections and time is set back, > >> +the connection limit is reached very quickly and rsync gets > deactivated, > >> +if time is changed again, rsync is never reactivated. > >> + > >> +date -s "xxx" > >> +xinetd[xxx]: Deactivating service rsync due to excessive incoming > connections. Restarting in 10 seconds. > >> + > >> +the timer of xinet.d is based on time() function, and it is affected > by system time. > >> + > >> +Upstream-Status: Pending > > Is this patch taken from here? > > https://github.com/openSUSE/xinetd/pull/45 > > > > If so, it has an incorrect upstream-status. Please fix that. > > yes, but the upstream does not merge the patch, yet. > > in this situation, what should I fill the status? > It’s should say Submitted [link to pr] > Thanks, > LiWang. > > > > > Alex > > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#202666): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/202666 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107610065/21656 Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
