On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 02:32:00PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 14:22, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: > > You just volunteered to handle all the "Does it work with yocto 1.2?" > > questions :) > > > > Simply put: people are stupid, they need explicit PHB compliant names in > > tags, even if it isn't 100% politically correct to say "yocto" when we > > actually mean "oe-core". > > > > Unless the yocto 1.2 release note state that it's based on oe-core "foo" > > and all layers compatible with "foo" use "foo" in tags/branches. > > I think layers ought to have tags for both ... > > <layer>-oe-core-<tag> > <layer>-yocto-<tag>
And <layer>-poky-<tag> for completeness? Seriously, "yocto"-naming schema is not that bad. For shortness, it can be "yp-1.2" as a suffix to the layer-specific tags... But I'm flexible with other naming schemas, such as "YYYY.MM" or "YYYY.#" -- Denys _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
