> why). Can you point to the upstream fix that they added to their repo?
The upstream modify the file configure to fix this bug:
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ WHICH_XTERM=$with_xterm_new
AC_SUBST(WHICH_XTERM)
case $host_os in
- (*linux-gnu|*cygwin|*mingw32|*msys)
+(linux*gnu|linux*gnuabi64|linux*gnuabin32|linux*gnueabi|linux*gnueabihf|linux*gnux32|uclinux*|gnu*|mint*|k*bsd*-gnu|cygwin|msys|mingw*|linux*uclibc|linux*musl)
want_xterm_kbs=DEL
;;
(*)
--
Best Regards
---------------------------------------------------
Wang Mingyu
FUJITSU NANJING SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (FNST)
No.6 Wenzhu Road, Nanjing, 210012, China
TEL：+86+25-86630566--8568
COINS: 79988548
FAX: +86+25-83317685
MAIL: [email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 6:46 PM
> To: Wang, Mingyu/王 鸣瑜 <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Lei,
> Maohui/雷 茂慧 <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [OE-core] [PATCH v3] ncurses: Fix install conflict when
> enable multilib.
>
> On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 at 03:11, Mingyu Wang (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > The upstream of ncurses has fixed this issue.
> >
> > But I'm not sure if it has been completely modified.
> >
> > I can submit an upgrade patch, do I still need to specify
> > --with-xterm-kbs=del in this patch？
>
> Unfortunately the upgrade patch is not acceptable (I wrote a separate response
> why). Can you point to the upstream fix that they added to their repo?
>
> Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#210271):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210271
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110639120/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
