On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 8:54 AM Ross Burton via lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2 Feb 2025, at 21:03, Vyacheslav Yurkov via lists.openembedded.org > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Instead of the python re-implementation build the actual systemctl from > > the systemd source tree. > > Very glad to see this - I tried some time ago but the dependency tree at the > time was quite invasive to remove so I gave up. >
As did I, before I did the shell -> python port. In theory I agree this is a good thing. > Have you verified that the final rootfs is identical (or in fact better) with > those compared to our reimplementation? > > > +DEPENDS = "gperf-native libcap-native util-linux-native > > python3-jinja2-native" > > I’d hope you can remove some more of those dependencies as we just need > systemctl? > The getent HOSTTOOLS in the other patch concerns me - that feels like it could easily be a host contamination problem. > > +Upstream-Status: Submitted > > Submitted where? > A nervousness I have with this, is this makes a systemd enabled image significantly dependent on systemd at build time, and the history of systemd taking patches which don't match their use cases (which I don't believe this does) is frankly very poor. -- Alex Kiernan
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#210635): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210635 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/110958135/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
