On Wed, 2025-02-05 at 14:55 -0700, Joshua Watt via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:36 PM Alexander Kanavin > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > We have discussed this before. With this change, users will no > > longer be able to set fragments from local.conf, as addfragments > > would be processed before that file. You need to use ?= in > > fragments instead for things that are meant to be overridden. > > Is there need to set fragments from local.conf? IMHO, not being able > to override a fragment in local.conf is "surprising" behavior, and I > don't think it's going to necessarily be possible to alway use ?= in > a fragment; all of the ad-hoc "fragment" management systems I've used > before have allowed local.conf to be the final source of truth, so it > will also make migration to use config fragments harder if they don't > follow suite. > > Anyway, maybe some other users of "fragment" like systems can chime > in if they have an opinion.
FWIW, setting fragments in local.conf is exactly how I first tried to use them and I can see users doing that :/ Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#210886): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210886 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111021218/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
