2025. 02. 06. 5:42 keltezéssel, Zoltán Böszörményi írta:
Signed-off-by: Zoltán Böszörményi <[email protected]> --- meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_4.20.0.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_4.20.0.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_4.20.0.bb index 6c995ff50c..d296c20d78 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_4.20.0.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_4.20.0.bb @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ WRAPPER_TOOLS = " \ do_install:append:class-native() { for tool in ${WRAPPER_TOOLS}; do test -x ${D}$tool && create_wrapper ${D}$tool \ + SEQUOIA_CRYPTO_POLICY=${STAGING_DATADIR_NATIVE}/crypto-policies/back-ends/rpm-sequoia.config \
Self review / explanation: This envvar is set unconditionally, regardless of PACKAGECONFIG="sequoia" being present or not for rpm. Reasoning: * it's needed when it's set * it's ignored when it's not set (rpm is not linked with librpm_sequoia.so) * the next patch for dnf also needs it, and AFAIK one recipe can't detect PACKAGECONFIG of a different recipe So setting it conditionally would have been pointless in the rpm recipe when it has to be set in the dnf recipe unconditionally.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#210894): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210894 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111027163/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
