The original goal was actually just to write a test for a u-boot
script in the fitImage and to document the various UBOOT_ENV
variables. I realized that the implementation is complicated and
hard to describe which also means hard to use.

To simplify things, this patch series introduces a new variable
FIT_UBOOT_ENV. It is only used by the kernel-fitimage.bbclass.
As a result, UBOOT_ENV is no longer used by u-boot and the
kernel-fitimage.bbclass, but only by u-boot.
This makes both the usage and the implementation simpler and solves
issues like getting the u-boot script installed into /boot and into
the fitImage.

Documentation patches are prepared here:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib/log/?h=adrianf/fitimage-test-uboot-env

Adrian Freihofer (4):
  kernel-fitimage.bbclass: introduce FIT_UBOOT_ENV
  kernel-fitimage.bbclass: do not use the UBOOT_ENV variable
  oe-selftest: fitimage split run_dumpimage function
  oe-selftest: fitimage add u-boot env script

 meta/classes-recipe/kernel-fitimage.bbclass | 16 +---
 meta/conf/image-fitimage.conf               |  7 ++
 meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/fitimage.py    | 88 +++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

-- 
2.47.1

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#210962): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/210962
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111042847/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to