On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 12:56 +0100, Vyacheslav Yurkov via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > From: Vyacheslav Yurkov <[email protected]> > > Instead of the python re-implementation build the actual systemctl > from > the systemd source tree. The python script was used when systemd > didn't > provide an option to build individual executables. It is possible in > the > meantime, so instead of always adapting the script when there's a new > functionality, we simply use upstream implementation. > > License-Update: Base recipe is used > > Signed-off-by: Vyacheslav Yurkov <[email protected]> > --- > .../systemd/systemd-systemctl-native.bb | 26 +- > ...-meson-add-install-tag-for-systemctl.patch | 25 ++ > ...2-meson-Bypass-certain-config-checks.patch | 64 +++ > .../systemd/systemd-systemctl/systemctl | 376 ---------------- > -- >
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/9/builds/1022 and many similar failures unfortunately. Did we get out of sync with systemd versions? I'm keen to have something like this recipe so thanks for working on it. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#211694): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/211694 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111249121/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
