On 27-02-2025 20:54, Randy MacLeod wrote:
On 2025-02-27 8:52 a.m., Varatharajan, Deepesh via
lists.openembedded.org wrote:
Tested the following:
bitbake rust, cargo, nativesdk-rust, core-image-minimal,
core-image-sato -c do_populate_sdk, core-image-sato -c testsdk, world
oe-selftest -r rust, reproducible
oe-selftest results for all archs as below:
Target pass skipped
x86_64 19141 438
x86 18954 625
ARM64 18983 596
ARM 18937 642
ppc 18893 686
If you have the numbers, please show us how that compares to the
test results for 1.82. Show before, after, diff.
Oe-selftest results as follows :
Before Update :
Target pass skipped
x86_64 18898 445
x86 18712 630
ARM64 18740 602
ARM 18694 649
ppc 18654 689
After Update :
Target pass skipped
x86_64 19141 438
x86 18954 625
ARM64 18983 596
ARM 18937 642
ppc 18893 686
Difference :
Target pass skipped
x86_64 +243 -7
x86 +242 -5
ARM64 +243 -6
ARM +243 -7
ppc +239 -3
If you don't have the exact numbers, from the patch, it looks like
you've only added 6 more tests as [ignore].
Is that right?
For 1.83 update , we added 3 tests as [ignore]. Other unit tests are
modified to adapt rust_1.83 sources.
Regards,
Deepesh
../Randy
Regards,
Deepesh
--
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#212019):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/212019
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/111414671/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
