Le ven. 23 janv. 2026 à 18:02, Yoann Congal <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Le ven. 23 janv. 2026 à 13:33, Peter Marko via lists.openembedded.org > <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Intention of this RFC is to run full autobuilder job matrix to see if >> there are any failures not detected by my local testsuite. >> > > I created a poky branch with this patch : > https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib/log/?h=ycongal/scarthgap/openssl_3.5_upgrade > (above my -nut branch to decrease the probability of an unrelated AB-INT > failure) > > I've started the build : > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/?#/builders/29/builds/3118 > Hello, As discussed during the tech call of last tuesday, I've started builds: * a new a-full with rebased branch on the latest scarthgap (now, the branch is only scarthgap+this upgrade) * https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/29/builds/3133/ failed on a unrelated AB-INT issue (#15945) but is otherwise OK * a meta-oe build (which includes a world build for meta-oe, meta-python, meta-networking & meta-filesystems): * https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/81/builds/1277 * *Failed on python3-m2crypto* (log.do_compile => https://gist.github.com/ycongal-smile/4c6501ecd81c9f475b793234cceb7a74) * to compare, I've started the same build with a vanilla scarthgap branch (without the openssl upgrade): * https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/81/builds/1278 => success (albeit with warnings) Can you investigate this python3-m2crypto failure? Also, the "meta-oe" build does not cover every layer in meta-openembedded, I think I will increase coverage to all the meta-openembedded layers for the next run... Topic for discussion is especially what should be the final form of this >> upgrade as some users may want to stay on openssl 3.2.x originally >> shipped with Yocto 5.0 Scarthgap. >> Current form was chosen to easily review recipe/patch differences. >> Is it fine to overwrite or do we need to keep both version and make one >> the default and other optional? Which would be tested on AB? >> >> Peter Marko (1): >> openssl: upgrade 3.2.6 -> 3.5.4 >> >> .../openssl/files/environment.d-openssl.sh | 9 ++- >> ...ke-history-reporting-when-test-fails.patch | 19 +++-- >> ...1-Configure-do-not-tweak-mips-cflags.patch | 4 +- >> ...sysroot-and-debug-prefix-map-from-co.patch | 26 ++++--- >> .../0001-extend-check_cwm-test-timeout.patch | 32 ++++++++ >> .../openssl/openssl/CVE-2024-41996.patch | 44 ----------- >> .../{openssl_3.2.6.bb => openssl_3.5.4.bb} | 76 +++++++++++++------ >> 7 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/0001-extend-check_cwm-test-timeout.patch >> delete mode 100644 >> meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/openssl/CVE-2024-41996.patch >> rename meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl/{openssl_3.2.6.bb => >> openssl_3.5.4.bb} (75%) >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > Yoann Congal > Smile ECS > -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#230088): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/230088 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117416674/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
