On Tue, 8 May 2012 14:20:16 -0500 Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote:
> > BTW: IIRC TUNE_CONFLICTS/TUNECONFLICTS inconsistency was discussed > > on ML already (I could not find that thread, but still it's used in > > meta/conf/machine/include/arm > > Ya, patches to fix these, and actually check them were sent to the > list, but I don't believe they have been merged yet. I hadn't noticed TUNE_CONFLICTS, just TUNECONFLICT and TUNECONFLICTS. As of this writing, I have two outstanding patches to do with that; I think the consistency patch is in, but we're still waiting on approval/more changes decisions on the sanity check implementation. -s -- Listen, get this. Nobody with a good compiler needs to be justified. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
