On Wed Mar 11, 2026 at 2:43 PM CET, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote:
> We also have this busybox ptest failure, only on arm64. I suspect it is
> related to this series, but I will launch a build to confirm.
>
> Failed ptests:
> {'busybox': ['printf_understands_%s_\'"x\'_"\'y"_"\'zTAIL"',
> 'printf_handles_positive_numbers_for_%f']}
>
> https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/20260311-60/testresults/qemuarm64-ptest/core-image-ptest-busybox/
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
I confirm the issue is gone after dropping this series, so the busybox
ptest failure is probably related to the glibc upgrade.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#232898):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/232898
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/118245369/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
