These module tarballs were once useful for certain development workflows. They are not that useful when deployed in CI, taking up space as release artefacts.
Not generating them by default saves time/space and users who need/use them can enable them, this makes more sense as a modern default. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> --- meta/classes-recipe/kernel-artifact-names.bbclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/kernel-artifact-names.bbclass b/meta/classes-recipe/kernel-artifact-names.bbclass index 1a7611a15e8..6d974663321 100644 --- a/meta/classes-recipe/kernel-artifact-names.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/kernel-artifact-names.bbclass @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ KERNEL_FIT_BIN_EXT ?= "${KERNEL_ARTIFACT_BIN_EXT}" MODULE_TARBALL_NAME ?= "${KERNEL_ARTIFACT_NAME}" MODULE_TARBALL_LINK_NAME ?= "${KERNEL_ARTIFACT_LINK_NAME}" -MODULE_TARBALL_DEPLOY ?= "1" +MODULE_TARBALL_DEPLOY ?= "0" INITRAMFS_NAME ?= "initramfs-${KERNEL_ARTIFACT_NAME}" INITRAMFS_LINK_NAME ?= "initramfs-${KERNEL_ARTIFACT_LINK_NAME}"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#236587): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/236587 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119195702/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
