Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> writes: >>>> Considering that in the meantime my similar patch [1] to systemd.bbclass >>>> got merged into meta-oe by Koen, who initially was against it, I guess >>>> this patch can finally get merged now, too. >>> >>> Crap, I missed the $D part, that's going to get reverted >> >> I think we can keep it when we enhance the systemctl script >> (systemd-systemctl-native) to ignore 'stop/start'. > > That won't work where you don't the have OE tree at hand.
Is this case really supported? Lot of scripts depend on encapsulation by 'pseudo' and/or special wrapper programs. E.g. 'update-alternatives' must be the tool of the OE tree; the host utility will be used which does not understand $OPKG_OFFLINE_ROOT. Else, systemd-systemctl-native is sysrooted by every package inheriting 'systemd.bbclass' and available in every OE tree. > Worst case: it will call the native systemctl and break the host > distro. This would also be the case for the already unwrapped | systemctl enable ....service But again... this is not a problem because a custom systemctl script is installed. Enrico _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core