Hi Alex, Thanks for your review. After these patches are merged, I think I can coordinate some of my colleagues to help with adding more recipes. In this way, the meta data for oe-core and meta-openembedded will be ready in one or two months. Reviewing previous commits of released branches is really a good idea! I think we'll also be checking repos, branches (as you suggested), changelogs and even upstreams directly to ensure the correctness.
Regards, Qi -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2026 5:36 PM To: Chen, Qi <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; MacLeod, Randy <[email protected]>; Daniel Turull <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OE-core][PATCH V5 1/7] recipeutils: add optional stable_upgrade parameter to get_recipe_upgrade_status Thanks, I think this is good and ready. I'll pick the auh patch when bitbake and core patches merge. We can add more recipes over time (e.g. openssl, webkit, glib, ...), they don't have to be in the initial patchset. Probably a review of scarthgap/whinlatter/walnascar/styhead commits can help identify more recipes with stable maintenance releases as well. Daniel's changelog extraction patches will also help a lot, take a look at them. Alex On Wed, 13 May 2026 at 07:23, <[email protected]> wrote: > > From: Chen Qi <[email protected]> > > We want the ability to do stable version upgrades for recipes. > To this end, add an optional stable_upgrade parameter to the > get_recipe_upgrade_status function, which defaults to False and when > enabled will try to get the latest stable version of the recipe. > > The UPSTREAM_STABLE_RELEASE_REGEX is respected. If a recipe sets it, > it will be used as the filter_regex. If it's not set explicitly, it > means that there's no stable updates or the recipe hasn't been checked > yet. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <[email protected]> > --- > meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py > index c6604f536d..7c1df518a8 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py > @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ def get_recipe_pv_with_pfx_sfx(pv, uri_type): > > return (pv, pfx, sfx) > > -def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd): > +def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd, stable_upgrade): > """ > Get upstream version of recipe using bb.fetch2 methods with support > for > http, https, ftp and git. > @@ -1080,7 +1080,15 @@ def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd): > except bb.fetch2.FetchError as e: > bb.warn("Unable to obtain latest revision: {}".format(e)) > else: > - pupver = ud.method.latest_versionstring(ud, rd) > + if stable_upgrade: > + stable_release_regex = > rd.getVar("UPSTREAM_STABLE_RELEASE_REGEX") > + if stable_release_regex: > + pupver = ud.method.latest_versionstring(ud, rd, > filter_regex=stable_release_regex) > + else: > + # Not explicitly setting "UPSTREAM_STABLE_RELEASE_REGEX" > means there's no stable upgrade > + pupver = (ru['current_version'], None) > + else: > + pupver = ud.method.latest_versionstring(ud, rd) > (upversion, revision) = pupver > > if upversion: > @@ -1094,8 +1102,8 @@ def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd): > > return ru > > -def _get_recipe_upgrade_status(data): > - uv = get_recipe_upstream_version(data) > +def _get_recipe_upgrade_status(data, stable_upgrade): > + uv = get_recipe_upstream_version(data, stable_upgrade) > > pn = data.getVar('PN') > cur_ver = uv['current_version'] > @@ -1119,9 +1127,10 @@ def _get_recipe_upgrade_status(data): > > return {'pn':pn, 'status':status, 'cur_ver':cur_ver, > 'next_ver':next_ver, 'maintainer':maintainer, 'revision':revision, > 'no_upgrade_reason':no_upgrade_reason} > > -def get_recipe_upgrade_status(recipes=None): > +def get_recipe_upgrade_status(recipes=None, stable_upgrade=False): > pkgs_list = [] > data_copy_list = [] > + stable_copy_list = [] > copy_vars = ('SRC_URI', > 'PV', > 'DL_DIR', > @@ -1134,6 +1143,7 @@ def get_recipe_upgrade_status(recipes=None): > 'UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX', > 'UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI', > 'UPSTREAM_VERSION_UNKNOWN', > + 'UPSTREAM_STABLE_RELEASE_REGEX', > 'RECIPE_MAINTAINER', > 'RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON', > 'RECIPE_UPSTREAM_VERSION', @@ -1180,12 +1190,13 @@ > def get_recipe_upgrade_status(recipes=None): > data_copy.setVar(k, data.getVar(k)) > > data_copy_list.append(data_copy) > + stable_copy_list.append(stable_upgrade) > > recipeincludes[data.getVar('FILE')] = > {'bbincluded':data.getVar('BBINCLUDED').split(),'pn':data.getVar('PN') > } > > from concurrent.futures import ProcessPoolExecutor > with ProcessPoolExecutor(max_workers=utils.cpu_count()) as executor: > - pkgs_list = executor.map(_get_recipe_upgrade_status, data_copy_list) > + pkgs_list = executor.map(_get_recipe_upgrade_status, > + data_copy_list, stable_copy_list) > > return _group_recipes(pkgs_list, > _get_common_include_recipes(recipeincludes)) > > -- > 2.34.1 >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#237014): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/237014 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119293054/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
