Op 1 aug. 2012, om 15:41 heeft "Burton, Ross" <ross.bur...@intel.com> het 
volgende geschreven:

> On 1 August 2012 14:32, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> That will sadly break all the powervr based evil binaries (e.g. all cortex 
>> arm chips from TI) since there will be 2 providers of those libs. I looked 
>> at this a few years ago (when mesa gained libegl) and I couldn't come up 
>> with a  solution other than "don't build it" :( That solution also breaks a 
>> number of usecases but back then I had the liberty to not care about those.
>> Does anyone have suggestions on how to handle this?
> 
> Rename the mesa ones to libegl-mesa (etc), and encourage TI to use libegl-ti?

Recipe names don't matter, the .so files in sysroots and shlibdeps do.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to