Op 1 aug. 2012, om 15:41 heeft "Burton, Ross" <ross.bur...@intel.com> het volgende geschreven:
> On 1 August 2012 14:32, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote: >> That will sadly break all the powervr based evil binaries (e.g. all cortex >> arm chips from TI) since there will be 2 providers of those libs. I looked >> at this a few years ago (when mesa gained libegl) and I couldn't come up >> with a solution other than "don't build it" :( That solution also breaks a >> number of usecases but back then I had the liberty to not care about those. >> Does anyone have suggestions on how to handle this? > > Rename the mesa ones to libegl-mesa (etc), and encourage TI to use libegl-ti? Recipe names don't matter, the .so files in sysroots and shlibdeps do. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core