2012/8/8 Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>: > On Wednesday 08 August 2012 17:04:16 Samuel Stirtzel wrote: >> > On Wednesday 08 August 2012 16:47:05 Koen Kooi wrote: >> >> Op 8 aug. 2012, om 16:03 heeft Paul Eggleton >> >> <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>> >> > het volgende geschreven: >> >> > And? KDE is far more demanding upon Qt than most Qt-based applications. We >> > had to make specific changes to our Qt recipes just to accommodate it. >> >> If you're talking about adding accessibility and session management to >> configure -> these are set by default by Qt. >> Don't know why they where unset in oe-core though. > > Not specifically, I was mainly referring to changes such as providing qt4- > native; we did not need to do that before.
While this is true, meta-kde is also the only layer using qt-mobility (AFAIK). So you implicitly want to say that Koen is right because _there are no other testcases_ for these recipes. Or do I get you wrong? > > Cheers, > Paul -- Regards Samuel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core