On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:10:20PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 27 September 2012 00:27:05 Martin Jansa wrote: > > Please test on more architectures. > > I've tested complete qt4-native + qt4-free-x11 on armv4t. > > And only do_patch for nativesdk-qt4-tools, qt-mobility-*, qt4-embedded. > > So this is great work and these patches look good, although I'm still not > particularly happy with breaking out so many of the configure options because > I'm convinced it won't stop here; but it's possible I might be overruled on > this issue.
I've added that, because meta-webos layer disables more stuff then .inc file forces enabled, so I would have to rewrite whole QT_CONFIG_FLAGS (if I don't want to have e.g. -webkit from .inc and -no-webkit appended after that through QT_DISTRO_FLAGS). But it can be just 2 variables instead of 6 if it's issue. > The bigger problem is when these patches are arriving - we're late into the > stabilisation period and given the choice I'd prefer not to merge them until > the next development cycle. The cleanup part is formal only, so with low risk IMHO. I have some layer with .bbappends to it which needs 4.8.3 (or 4.8.2) so recipe even with negative D_P would help me to be able to use next oe-core release. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: martin.ja...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
