On 9/28/12 4:52 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:40 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
On 09/24/2012 02:30 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 14:26 +0300, Andrei Dinu wrote:
+-          *reloc_addr += sym->st_value;
++          *reloc_addr = sym->st_value;
That patch looks slightly dubious to me.  Are you sure this doesn't
introduce any regressions elsewhere?


I have insufficient data to affirm that it doesn't introduces regressions.

Presumably it does at least pass the eglibc and binutils testsuites,
right?

That patch is a workaround for an ARM issue related to thread local storage and TLS offsets during runtime and prelinking.

See https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443

Note, this is simply a workaround and not a final solution as it hasn't been vetted upstream.

--Mark

p.



_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core



_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to