On 10/9/2012 8:38 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 9 October 2012 11:38, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
* I sent this months ago but was told that oe-core is not the right place,
   however, we think it makes sense to add ruby to complete the scripting
   language set of: python, perl, ruby, so I re-send it.

I have to say, my opinion is the same now as it was then. Ruby support is
certainly useful to have, and we have had requests for it; but unlike Perl and
Python which are needed by many other things, nothing we have in OE-Core
actually needs Ruby; thus it really belongs in another layer IMHO.

Agreed.  If we're completing the set of scripting languages there's
plenty left out.  A standalone meta-ruby layer that contains the
runtime and pretty much every useful library sounds like a much better
idea as the runtime and the libraries will be in a single place and
incompatible changes can be done in a single move without having to
co-ordinate multiple layers.

I see, thanks, so I think I should send it to meta-oe at this point.

Thanks,
Jackie


Ross


--
Jackie Huang
WIND RIVER | China Development Center
MSN:jackiel...@hotmail.com
Tel: +86 8477 8594
Mobile: +86 138 1027 4745

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to