Martin Jansa <martin.ja...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:29:21AM +0000, Patrick Turley wrote: >> On Oct 16, 2012, at 6:28 PM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> >> wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday 17 October 2012 00:37:39 Martin Jansa wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 05:47:26PM -0400, Marc Ferland wrote: >> >>> Adds the lm_sensors applications. These consists of: >> >> Is it really needed in oe-core? why not meta-oe? >> > >> > I'm thinking meta-oe is the place for this. As a bonus, rrdtool is already >> > there. >> >> I am not qualified to have an opinion either way - but I *am* >> curious about the motivating rationale. What are the reasons that >> this should appear in meta-oe? > > oe-core as *core* for other layers, should have only the most important > metadata which are needed for all other layers, like toolchain etc. > > A lot of embedded images does not include or need lmsensors, so it's > kind of extra package which does not need to be included in *core*. > Thanks for the clarification Martin. But looking at oe-core/meta/recipe-bsp I see things like acpid, libacpi, pcimciautils, etc. I am wondering what makes lmsensors so much different than these tools?
Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core