On 11/27/2012 10:15 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Shakeel, Muhammad
<muhammad_shak...@mentor.com> wrote:
From: Muhammad Shakeel<muhammad_shak...@mentor.com>
From udev 174 changelog:
"The udev daemon moved to /lib/udev/udevd. Non-systemd init systems
and non-dracut initramfs image generators need to change the init
scripts. Alternatively the udev build needs to move udevd back to
/sbin or create a symlink in /sbin, which is not done by default."
Also for 64 bit architectures there exists /lib64/udev instead of
/lib/udev and current init script fails to start udev.
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Shakeel<muhammad_shak...@mentor.com>
As far as I know, all code in master now handles it properly (the
missing bits I sent a patch today) so why to include this symlink?
I'm not sure about this.
Two things:
1) Have we ever tested udev on a target where its ${base_libdir} is
'/lib64'?
Apparently, if udevd is intalled under '/lib64', its init script cannot
start udev correctly.
2) Bug#2804 is related to to udev and ${base_libdir}.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2804
(Some packages hardcode their udev rules directory to be
'/lib/udev/rules.d/'. So can udev find them if the ${base_libdir} is
'/lib64'? )
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
