On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 22:15 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > If x11 is disabled from DISTRO_FEATURE we don't build the ximagesink > package, but it still becomes a dependency in the final image which > causes a failure > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <s...@linux.intel.com> > --- > .../gstreamer/gst-meta-base_0.10.bb | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst-meta-base_0.10.bb > b/meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst-meta-base_0.10.bb > index 2fb39d5..0889437 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst-meta-base_0.10.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gst-meta-base_0.10.bb > @@ -16,7 +16,10 @@ PACKAGES = "\ > > ALLOW_EMPTY = "1" > > +X11_RDEPENDS = "${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'x11', > 'gst-plugin-base-ximagesink', '', d)}" > + > RDEPENDS_gst-meta-base = "\ > + ${X11_RDEPENDS} \ > gstreamer \ > gst-plugins-base-playbin \ > gst-plugins-base-decodebin \
This doesn't make sense, surely there would be some removal of a dependency as well as an addition? Looking at the recipe, the ximagesink dependency is already dependent on DISTRO_FEATURES and is in the gst-meta-x11-base package, not gst-meta-base? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core