Richard Purdie wrote: > > meta/classes/image.bbclass | 6 ++- > > meta/classes/packagegroup.bbclass | 2 +- > > meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 15 ++++++++- > > Whilst we're in bootstrapping mode for this work, how about we make > these changes a "ptest.bbclass" file which we'd inherit in the recipes > where we've got ptest enabled?
Having looked into it a bit, I'm not sure I understand how you mean. First, I don't quite see how this would be done in an elegant way for the in-function changes in image.bbclass and packagegroup.bbclass. And the lines added to bitbake.conf were put there because they mirror other complementary packages like -dbg and -dev. Is it really a good idea to invent a new way of doing this for -ptest packages? -- Björn _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
