On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 08:56 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz > <marcin.juszkiew...@linaro.org> wrote: > W dniu 18.12.2012 14:32, Bruce Ashfield pisze: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Richard Purdie On Tue, > 2012-12-11
> > If we bring this in, I'd prefer to completely drop the 3.4 > kernel > > headers, since having just one recipe in the tree make > sense, and it > > won't tempt us to start having a trail of one libc-header > per kernel > > version (since there's always a layer somewhere that's using > a given > > version). > > > What about a middle ground ? I can pull this into my tree, > since I'm > > doing some 3.8 and 3.4-stable work at the moment, I'll > remove the 3.4 > > kernel headers and then submit it again as part of my queue > with some > > extra tests run ? > > > I am fine with it. > > Thanks, I'll pull this in if Richard agrees. > Sounds like a plan to me. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core