The specific case I am looking at is fftw in meta-oe, ,but I believe this is a general problem.
The fftw recipe has a .inc file that includes the SRC_URI to a tarball and bb files that build packages with slightly different compile options. The tarball checksums are in the version specific bb files. I am on the process of updating the fftw recipes to the most recent version. Along the way I noticed it looks like the checksum test is being ignored. The only way I can get it to fail is to remove all the checksum entries from the bb files. Something needs fixing and I'd like to know what we want in the recipes before I submit the fixes, even if bitbake is broken :) Should the checksums move to the .inc file? (bad since that makes the .inc file version specific). Should they be duped in each recipe? (Annoying and doesn't really work) Maybe another version specific include? (likely won't work, but could be fixed) Philip _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core