On 02/26/2013 03:16 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 26 February 2013 11:10, Jack Mitchell <m...@communistcode.co.uk> wrote:
I think it is best to be defined as a separate package connman-client within
the current connman recipe. My reasoning for this is that connman is widely
used as an embedded network manager and its main interface is dbus rather
than the 'helper' program connmanctl.
+1 to connman-client
Cristian - in another commit can you also add connman-client to the
tools-testapps image feature?
+1 here also!
Sau!
Ross
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core