On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 20:32 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > On 02/27/2013 07:00 AM, tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> > > > > Add libaudit, used by system call auditing applications. From the > > sources: > > > > "The audit package contains the user space utilities for storing and > > searching the audit records generate by the audit subsystem in the > > Linux 2.6 kernel." > > > > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > .../libaudit/libaudit/build-lib-only.patch | 33 ++ > > .../libaudit/libaudit/fix-host-gen.patch | 461 > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb | 25 ++ > > 3 files changed, 519 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 > > meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit/build-lib-only.patch > > create mode 100644 > > meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit/fix-host-gen.patch > > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb > > > > <SNIP> > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb > > b/meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..e28b619 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/meta/recipes-support/libaudit/libaudit_2.2.2.bb > > @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ > > +DESCRIPTION = "libaudit is the dynamic library needed for applications to > > use the audit framework." > > +SECTION = "libs" > > +AUTHOR = "Steve Grubb <sgr...@redhat.com>" > > +HOMEPAGE = "http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/"; > > +LICENSE = "LGPLv2+" > > +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f" > > +PR = "r0" > > + > > +SRC_URI = "http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/audit/audit-${PV}.tar.gz \ > > + file://build-lib-only.patch \ > > + file://fix-host-gen.patch \ > > + " > > + > > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "6641fde111cf5dfda6d4282ab8410df5" > > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > > "8bc2b45a5f08f5df6cebcd5543f24b7e68e28b64da4b23f08de2c6616384302b" > > + > > +S = "${WORKDIR}/audit-${PV}" > > + > > +inherit autotools > > + > > +EXTRA_OECONF = "--disable-dependency-tracking --disable-listener" > > + > > +do_configure() { > > + oe_runconf > > +} > > > Is this do_configure really needed? Does the autotools default not work > correctly? And if not why not?
This is to avoid the autoreconf step, which ends up overwriting the lib/Makefile.in changes when it regenerates it from lib/Makefile.am. The Makefile.in is shipped with the source tarball, so I modified it directly instead of complicating things by trying to get autoreconf to generate the correct Makefile for the target part of the build vs these specific changes to Makefile.in for the set of programs generated to run on the host. Tom > > Sau! > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
