On Mar 11, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> > Op 10 mrt. 2013, om 00:54 heeft Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> het volgende > geschreven: > >> Create a new package to hold the hwdb.d >> Fixes the packaging warning as well. >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> >> --- >> meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb | 4 +++- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb >> b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb >> index 381a67b..9fc4704 100644 >> --- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb >> +++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_198.bb >> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ python populate_packages_prepend (){ >> } >> PACKAGES_DYNAMIC += "^lib(udev|gudev|systemd).*" >> >> -PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-gui ${PN}-vconsole-setup ${PN}-initramfs ${PN}-analyze" >> +PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-gui ${PN}-vconsole-setup ${PN}-initramfs ${PN}-analyze >> ${PN}-hwdb" >> >> USERADD_PACKAGES = "${PN}" >> GROUPADD_PARAM_${PN} = "-r lock" >> @@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ FILES_${PN} = " ${base_bindir}/* \ >> /lib/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules \ >> " >> >> +FILES_${PN}-hwdb = "/lib/udev/hwdb.d" >> + > > It's a udev hwdb, so calling it systemd-hwdb would be very misleading. OK I had it called udev-hwdb until I thought otherwise and changed it > And aren't you missing a RRECOMMENDS? I think Ross already has this taken care of so this patch might be moot. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core