On 04/02/2013 04:02 PM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote:
2013/4/2 Radu Moisan <radu.moi...@intel.com>:
This fixes a service dependency issue;
While graphical.target is the default mode, systemd
will try to start display-manager.service which is not
available.
For xserver-nodm-init we would then have something like:
inherit update-alternatives
ALTERNATIVE_${PN} = "systemd-def-target"
ALTERNATIVE_TARGET[systemd-def-target] =
"${systemd_unitdir}/system/graphical.target"
ALTERNATIVE_LINK_NAME[systemd-def-target] =
"${systemd_unitdir}/system/default.target"
ALTERNATIVE_PRIORITY[systemd-def-target] ?= "10"
Signed-off-by: Radu Moisan <radu.moi...@intel.com>
---
meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb
b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb
index ba1d133..bf1eb39 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_199.bb
@@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ update-alternatives --install ${base_sbindir}/halt halt
${base_bindir}/systemctl
update-alternatives --install ${base_sbindir}/reboot reboot
${base_bindir}/systemctl 300
update-alternatives --install ${base_sbindir}/shutdown shutdown
${base_bindir}/systemctl 300
update-alternatives --install ${base_sbindir}/poweroff poweroff
${base_bindir}/systemctl 300
+update-alternatives --install ${systemd_unitdir}/system/default.target
systemd-def-target ${systemd_unitdir}/system/multi-user.target 1
}
pkg_prerm_systemd () {
@@ -256,6 +257,7 @@ update-alternatives --remove halt ${base_bindir}/systemctl
update-alternatives --remove reboot ${base_bindir}/systemctl
update-alternatives --remove shutdown ${base_bindir}/systemctl
update-alternatives --remove poweroff ${base_bindir}/systemctl
+update-alternatives --remove systemd-def-target
${systemd_unitdir}/system/multi-user.target
}
pkg_postinst_udev-hwdb () {
--
1.7.9.5
Reliving a dejavu?
This was already rejected before see [1], hope you remember this.
[1]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-January/034806.html
It was not rejected, have you seen a nack from Ross? Actually I just
checked a few days ago with Ross and the reason it didn't merge was
because it didn't apply anymore. And because systemd upgrade to v199 was
pending I waited for that one to get pulled in. So now with systemd_199
in, here is my rebased v3 as well.
There is a bug filled for this problem Bug#3816, do you have a better
solution in mind?
Radu
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
