Op 23 apr. 2013, om 10:41 heeft "Burton, Ross" <ross.bur...@intel.com> het
volgende geschreven:
> Hi Koen,
>
> On 23 April 2013 09:18, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>> A real patch will follow later after I test this (full rebuild going on due
>> to the BACKFILL snafu mentioned earlier), but it boils down to:
>>
>> [koen@rrMBP systemd]$ diff -Nurd systemd_199.bb systemd_202.bb
>> --- systemd_199.bb 2013-04-22 16:53:18.450910639 +0200
>> +++ systemd_202.bb 2013-04-23 09:48:06.803283711 +0200
>> - --with-sysvrcnd-path=${sysconfdir} \
>> + ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'sysvinit',
>> '--with-sysvrcnd-path=${sysconfdir}', '--with-sysvrcnd-path=', d)} \
>>
>> Is anyone fundamentally opposed to this going in early in the 1.5 cycle
>> provided my tests work out?
>
> I have no problem with making this a PACKAGECONFIG straight away, but
> total disabling of sysvinit compact code would mean mass breakage as
> we've not yet managed 100% systemd coverage of the init scripts in
> oe-core.
This way of forcing change seems to be the preferred method in OE-core based on
previous experiences hence the suggestion of doing this early in 1.5.
But yeah, a PACKAGECONFIG option would work for me as well. I'll wait for 203
to get released and post a recipe with that.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
